Site Selection for Radiology Centres
Most diagnostic centre projects do not fail because of the equipment. They fail because the site could not actually support it — and that was discovered after the lease was signed. Site selection is where that risk gets caught, while it is still cheap.
What we check before you sign
- Room and clearance requirements — candidate premises screened against the equipment minimum room dimensions, slab-to-slab height and service clearances
- The delivery route — gate, driveway, entrance, corridors, turning radii, lift dimensions and lift capacity, door openings, all the way to the final gantry position
- Structural capacity for the static load in position and the transit load along that route
- Power and earthing adequacy — incoming supply, transformer capacity, and whether a compliant dedicated earth can be achieved on the site at all
- Radiation safety adjacency — what occupies the spaces above, below and beside the proposed room, since that drives shielding cost and can complicate AERB approval
- Expansion room — whether a second modality can be added later without rebuilding
A written go/no-go report, per site
Each candidate site gets a written feasibility report rather than a verbal opinion: what the site supports as-is, what would need remediation, and what that remediation would cost. That turns a leasing decision into a comparison between known quantities instead of a guess.
Common site failures we catch early
- Corridors, lifts and door openings too small for the equipment — the failure that surfaces on delivery day if nobody checked
- Slabs that cannot take a magnet or gantry without strengthening
- Incoming supply inadequate for the modality, with no viable upgrade path
- Adjacency problems that make shielding disproportionately expensive
- No workable quench vent route for an MRI, which can rule out a floor entirely
- Nowhere serviceable to site a chiller platform
Site and equipment are one decision
Evaluating premises without a specific equipment model in mind risks a mismatch found later, because the equipment dimensions and loads are what define whether a site works. We assess candidate sites and candidate systems against each other, so the two decisions are made together. See how this fits the wider turnkey scope.
Site selection, answered.
Should site selection happen before or after choosing the equipment?
What does a feasibility report actually cover?
Can you assess a site we have already leased?
How many sites can you assess?
Continue reading.
Planning a radiology project?
Tell us about your site, equipment and project stage.